In theory, authors cite an item because it is relevant to the topic of their own work. The original and best-known database for citation searching is Web of Science. Although other databases, including SciFinder, have added this feature, their citation coverage is weak for older articles.
Web of Science | SciFinder |
![]() |
![]() |
Tips:
Search SciFinder, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles citing the article "Alkali-Metal-Mediated Synergistic Effects in Polar Main Group Organometallic Chemistry" by Robertson, Uzelac, and Mulvey in Chemical Reviews. Compare the results. Why do they vary so much between databases?