Skip to Main Content
Chat With Us

Library Orientation for Nursing Graduate Students

:

More Ways to Build Your Online Identity

Overview of resources and services to support your education & research.

Build Your Scholarly and/or Professional Identity

Assessing Research Impact or Quality

Bibliometrics

Citation counts, publication counts, journal acceptance rates, and "factors" based on quantitative data are surrogate measures for the quality and impact of published research. Like clinical surrogate measures, they may provide an inaccurate or incomplete measure of research impact and quality. Compare surrogate measures across journals only when the publications cover the same discipline and sub-discipline.

Becker Medical Library Model for Assessment of Research Impact

The Becker model supplements traditional bibliometric measures. Researchers can track the impact of their work on:

  • Advancement of Knowledge: includes grants awarded, uses of promotional materials, number of trainees
  • Clinical Implementation: includes new drugs
  • Community Benefit: includes spin-off consumer products, partnerships to address community needs
  • Legislation and Policy: includes expert testimony presented to legislatures, citations in widely-used standards
  • Economic Benefit: includes cost savings and cost effectiveness, licensing agreements, spin-off and start-up companies

Metrics Concerns

  • Many metrics are not available if a journal is very new
  • Journal prestige can vary over time
  • "Review journals" (those which publish mostly review articles) have elevated Journal Impact Factor and CiteScore values, since review articles are usually heavily cited
  • Citation metrics for a journal do not determine the quality of any particular article within a journal, and they do not predict whether a particular article will be heavily cited (or not)
  • Social factors affect citation counts—for example, female authors are cited less than male authors